Follow Indigo Journal on Twitter (@indigojournal)
Indigo Journal



The Progressive Political Blog for South Carolina

  • Comment & Write on IJ
  • Indigo Journal Editors
  • Got a hot tip?

  • IndiGO - IJ Mobile Edition

    Sponsors


    Advertise on Indigo Journal

    Search I.J.




    Advanced Search



    Connect on Facebook


    OECD Inequality Report Blows a Hole In Republican "Spread the Wealth" Fearmongering

    by: AnyIdiotSC

    Sun Oct 26, 2008 at 16:32:31 PM EDT


    ( - promoted by Jennifer Read)

    The latest desperation jab from the McCain campaign accuses Obama of wanting to "spread the wealth."

    When the Bush Administration is in the process of spending $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars to bailout some of the richest people in the country, while refusing to extend unemployment benefits for victims of the financial collapse or force banks to renegotiate predatory loans, I've gotta think that a few of Sarah Palin's "real Americans" are warming to the idea of spreading the wealth.

    What Republicans don't want you to know is that redistribution of income and wealth toward the rich has be happening for decades, and it has accelerated since 2000 under a Republican Administration.

    The United States currently ranks 4th worst in income inequality, according to a recent report from 30-nation Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development - or OECD. Here's a link to the The U.S. has the 4th worst income inequality, behind Mexico, Turkey and Portugal of the 30 OECD nations. Here's a link to the report summary for the United States.


    OECD Inequality Graph.jpg

    Report highlights:

    • The U.S. has the 4th worst income inequality, behind Mexico, Turkey and Portugal of the 30 OECD nations.
    • U.S. wealth inequality is even worse. The richest 1% hold 25-33% of the country's total net worth, the top 10% hold 71%. (By comparison, OECD average: top 10% hold 28% of wealth.)
    • Redistribution of income by government plays a relatively minor role in the United States. Only in Korea is the effect smaller. This is partly because the level of spending on social benefits such as unemployment benefits and family benefits is low – equivalent to just 9% of household incomes, while the OECD average is 22%.
    • The distribution of earnings widened by 20% since the mid-1980s which is more than in most other OECD countries. This is the main reason for widening inequality in America.
    • Social mobility is lower in the United States than in other countries like Denmark, Sweden and Australia. Children of poor parents are less likely to become rich than children of rich parents.

    Republicans preached "trickle down" Reaganomics, but what we got was geyser up. This was no accident or inevitable result of globalization or free market Darwinism. Plutocrats in robes of free market theology designed the system to deliver the goods by changing tax code, trade policy, labor policy and corporate governance, by reducing oversight and regulation, and by attacking safety nets in place since the New Deal.

    Bill Moyers examines the current financial crisis and growing income divide in the October 24 edition of Bill Moyers Journal.

    Does anyone recall if the Republicans' "Contract with America" included a claw-back clause on our economy?

    AnyIdiotSC :: OECD Inequality Report Blows a Hole In Republican "Spread the Wealth" Fearmongering
    Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    The rich shouldn't be given any special breaks... (0.00 / 0)
    But our policies should focus on overall economic performance much more than income inequality.  If everyone is doing better and the rich are doing much better, isn't everyone better off?

    Income redistribution, perhaps a noble goal, comes with a tangible economic price.  If you tax people for making more money, they'll produce less goods and services, meaning our economy suffers.  We might be willing to redistribute anyway (in general I'm wary of it), but we've got to consider that jobs will be lost and productivity will decrease.

    Another thing to keep in mind: as of 2006, the top 1% of all earners paid 34% of all federal income taxes, and the top 5% of all earners paid 54% of all federal income taxes ( http://www.ntu.org/main/page.p... ).  Saying the rich don't pay their fair share when the top 5% of all earners provide more than half of our income tax funds seems absurd to me.

    And I'm not sure which trade policies you're talking about, but the mantra of "free trade promotes economic growth" is one of the few things almost all economists agree on.  Saying that free trade is bad for our nation is like saying that intelligent design is great science.

    For the record, McCain endorsed a plan similar in principle to Obama's years ago, so he's got no room to talk.  And I can't see how we're supposed to afford either candidate's tax plan when we're facing huge budget shortfalls and a bad economy.


    I don't disagree with you entirely (0.00 / 0)
    I consider myself a capitalist. I believe that profit incentive can be a powerful, positive motivator. I believe that people who work harder, smarter, and/or longer or who provide exceptional talents or skills should be rewarded for their efforts with higher pay than someone providing less. Unequal income, if you will. But that's not what we're talking about here.

    CEOs don't earn 400 times an average worker's pay because of their abilities, their performance, or longer hours. A lot of the highest paid folks on Wall Street were obviously better at looting their companies than managing, and our system rewarded them handsomely. Cross-breeding in corporate boardrooms allows the executive class to bid up their pay levels of magnitude above their peers in other very competitive countries. That's just one example of a rigged system.

    Worker productivity has risen fairly steadily in the U.S. since WWII. Up until the early 1970s, wages tracked the same rise, as did corporate profits and executive pay. But since about 1973, gains from productivity have gone increasing to shareholder profits and executive pay. That's no accident but the direct results of union bashing and trade policies encourage offshoring.

    We're a country that taxes labor more than we tax ownership. Your tax numbers conveniently exclude payroll tax, which takes a far bigger bight from the typical paycheck. When you include all federal, state, and local taxes, low income workers in SC pay about the same percentage of income in tax as the wealthiest 1%. That's primarily thanks to the cap on income subject to payroll tax and the lower tax rate on capital gains.

    You might argue that payroll taxes should be considered separately because its a sort of pension plan investment. But you'll note that the OECD report I referenced includes all forms of income, including government assistance. And still poor and middle income Americans are loosing ground.

    We could argue forever about the causes of accelerating income inequality and concentration of wealth, but the fact of it is undeniable. We live in a country where the richest 400 families hold more wealth than the bottom 57 million. That's not healthy for our democracy, and it's not sustainable.

    We, as a society, have a right and a duty to shape our economic systems so that everyone who works benefits and shares in the growth of the whole. That's not what we have now. We can and should harness the best of free markets wherever they deliver the results we want, and we should harness public policy to makeup for the failures and inadequacies of markets and the failures and inadequacies of the humans that run them.



    [ Parent ]
    Sorry I'm a bit late here, but... (0.00 / 0)
    I hadn't really considered all of the other taxes that the poor end up paying.  That does make a difference.

    [ Parent ]
    Premium Sponsor

    Advertise on Indigo Journal

    Your Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    Indigo Journal Blog Roll


    Follow Us

    Indigo Journal TwitterIndigo Journal Zannel


    Powered by: SoapBlox