|
education 
Thu Mar 04, 2010 at 10:14:02 AM EST
|
|
SC New Democrats are all about Big Ideas, and we think some of the recent proposals to come through the Statehouse are on the right track, but they don't go far enough. In SCND President Phil Noble's op-ed in today's The State, we lay out a few big ideas of our own to start with that we think we can really get SC back on track.
From The State (3/4/10):
We all know South Carolina is going through tough times. Moreover, we all know how hard the Republican Legislature and governor are struggling to deal with falling tax revenues and forced budget cuts.
Some of these Republicans have come up with some innovative ideas - but they don't go far enough. The Republicans are just too timid.
For instance, a Republican-controlled committee recently passed a measure to let schools cut five teacher work days off the school year to help make up for a $563 million shortfall. This is a small step in the right direction, of course, but we say go all the way. Let's just eliminate all funding for schools in South Carolina.
Yes, I know that this sounds like a drastic idea. But let's look at the bigger picture.
It's not as if our children can't get an education elsewhere. There are lots of first-rate programs on TV. The History Channel is good. The Weather Channel is sort of like science. There are plenty of Bible-thumping TV preachers to tell them all they need to know about family values and how the world was created. And it's all included in the price of $29-a-month basic cable package. That's a lot less than the $12,000 a year per kid we now spend.
If that is too radical for you, we could adopt a more gradual approach. Instead of eliminating all funding at once, we could just continue to cut the number of teachers. Then, when the number of students crammed into every classroom jumps to 50 or 60, the remaining teachers will be so overwhelmed they will go crazy and quit. And when they quit, we don't have to pay their unemployment benefits. Talk about a win-win.
The possibilities don't stop there. Think, for example, of all the school buses that will no longer be needed. We could just park them along the side of the road and let homeless families move in. If they took the seats out and put up some pretty little curtains, it could be cozy.
Eliminating education would also take a lot of stress off legislators. They would not have to make any more hard policy choices or ever say no to their special-interest friends. No one would care when they gave away $2.7 billion in sales tax exemptions in exchange for campaign contributions. No longer would they even have to think of eliminating the sales tax cap on yachts and luxury cars. All would be good.
Plus, with no schools, there are no school lunches, so Andre Bauer would not have to spend time worrying about feeding all the strays.
More importantly, the Legislature would be able to spend its time on the really big issues facing our state.
In the past few weeks alone, Republican legislators have demonstrated their willingness to tackle these big problems by introducing bills to ban the sale of liquor on Thanksgiving and Christmas, expand the range of golf carts on public roads and lower the legal age for getting a tattoo.
These courageous efforts pale, however, in comparison to the work being done by Republican Rep. Mike Pitts of Laurens, whose latest bill surely will solve all of our state's financial problems - forever.
Rep. Pitts' bill would require South Carolina to abandon U.S. currency as legal tender. What a great idea! We could simply hire a smart kid to fire up the Photoshop program on his computer and whip us up some nifty new money designs. There might even be some good ones still left lying around from the last time we tried this in 1860. We could call them Palmetto Bucks.
Then we could pay off all those pesky state debts, and any time we ran low, we could just tell Republican state Treasurer Converse Chellis to run down to the local Kinko's speedy quick and run off a few hundred million more.
So, to all you soft-headed cry babies who think we actually have any real problems in our state, we say think big. And special thanks to S.C. Republicans for reminding us that fortune never favors the faint-hearted, and that extremism in the defense of ignorance is no vice.
Originally printed in The State, cross-posted on the SC New Dems blog.
For more from the SC New Democrats, visit SCNewDemocrats.org. And don't forget to join us on Twitter and Facebook.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 10:55:24 AM EST
|
|
State Superintendent of Education Jim Rex today received the endorsement of veteran educator Chester Floyd, currently the superintendent in Lexington School District Three. Previously, Floyd served as the superintendent of the Berkeley County School District. He joins forty-seven of the state's school district superintendents, who, in an unprecedented move, came together last week to voice their support for Rex as he seeks to become South Carolina's next Governor.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Sun Feb 21, 2010 at 11:28:49 AM EST
|
|
Wausau Daily Herald: Husband and his wife are helping an African nation farm its was out of poverty
Husband and his wife are helping an African nation farm its was out of poverty
http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/print/article/20100221/WDH06/2210303/Edgar-native-one-of-Malawi-s-miracle-workershttp://www.wausaudailyherald.com/print/article/20100221/WDH06/2210303/Edgar-native-one-of-Malawi-s-miracle-workers
By Danielle Nierenberg For the Wausau Daily Herald
Stacia and Kristof Nordin have an unusual backyard, and it looks a lot different from the Edgar yard in which Kristof grew up.
Rather than the typical bare dirt patch of land that most Malawians sweep "clean" every day, the Nordins have more than 200 varieties of mostly indigenous vegetables growing organically around their house. They came to Malawi in 1997 as Peace Corps volunteers, but now call Malawi home. Stacia is a technical adviser to the Malawi Ministry of Education, working to sensitize both policymakers and citizens about the importance of using indigenous foods and permaculture to improve livelihoods and nutrition. Kristof is a community educator who works to train people at all levels of Malawian society in low-input and sustainable agricultural practices.
The Nordins use their home as a demonstration plot for permaculture methods that incorporate composting, water harvesting, intercropping and other methods that help build organic matter in soils, conserve water, and protect agricultural diversity. Most Malawians think of traditional foods, such as amaranth and African eggplant, as poor-people foods grown by "bad" farmers. But these crops might hold the key for solving hunger, malnutrition and poverty in Malawi -- as well as in other African countries.
Nowhere needs the help more than Malawi, a nation of 14 million in southeast Africa that is among the least developed and most densely populated on Earth.
The country might be best known for the so-called "Malawi Miracle." Five years ago, the government decided to do something controversial and provide fertilizer subsidies to farmers to grow maize. Since then, maize production has tripled and Malawi has been touted as an agricultural success story.
But the way they are refining that corn, says Kristof, makes it "kind of like Wonder Bread," leaving it with just two or three nutrients. Traditional varieties of corn, which aren't usually so highly processed, are more nutritious and don't require as much artificial fertilizer as do hybrid varieties.
"Forty-eight percent of the country's children are still nutritionally stunted, even with the so-called miracle," Kristof says. Rather than focusing on just planting maize -- a crop that is not native to Africa -- the Nordins advise farmers with whom they work that there is "no miracle plant -- just plant them all." Research has shown that Malawi has more than 600 indigenous and naturalized food plants to choose from. Maize, ironically, is one of the least suited to this region because it's highly susceptible to pests, disease and erratic rainfall patterns.
Unfortunately, the "fixation on just one crop," says Kristof, means that traditional varieties of foods are going extinct -- crops that already are adapted to drought and heat, traits that become especially important as agriculture copes with climate change.
"Design," says Kristof, "is key in permaculture," meaning that everything from garden beds to the edible fish pond to the composting toilet have an important role on their property. And although their neighbors have been skeptical, they're impressed by the quantity -- and diversity -- of food grown by the family. More than 200 indigenous fruits and vegetables are grown on their small plot of land, providing a year-round supply of food to the Nordins and their neighbors.
In addition, they're creating a "model village" by training several families who rent houses on the property,) to practice and teach others about the permaculture techniques that they use around their homes. They also have built an "edible playground," where children can play, eat and learn about various indigenous fruits.
More important, the Nordins are showing that by not sweeping, burning and removing all organic matter, people can get more out of the land than just maize and reduce their dependence on high-cost agricultural inputs in the process.
And indigenous crops can be an important source of income for farmers. Rather than import amaranth, sorghum, spices, tamarinds and other products from India, South Africa and other countries, the Nordins are helping farmers find ways to market seeds, as well as value-added products, from local resources. These efforts not only provide income and nutrition, but fight the "stigma that anything Malawian isn't good enough," says Kristof. "The solutions," he says, "are literally staring us in the face."
And as a visitor walked around seeing and tasting the various crops at the Nordins' home, it became obvious that maize is not Malawi's only miracle.
Danielle Nierenberg is a senior researcher at the Worldwatch Institute, blogging daily from Africa at: http://blogs.worldwatch.org/nourishingtheplanet/. She can be reached at dnierenberg@worldwatch.org.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Wed Feb 17, 2010 at 10:44:00 AM EST
|
|
Cross posted from Nourishing the Planet. 
Check out the most recent issue of the journal Science which takes a look at ways to improve food security as the world's population is expected to top 9 billion by 2050. To best nourish both people and the planet, the journal suggests a rounded approach to a worldwide agricultural revolution by encouraging diets and policies that emphasize local and sustainable food production, along with the implementation of agricultural techniques that utilize biotechnology and ecologically friendly farming solutions.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Mon Feb 08, 2010 at 17:05:24 PM EST
|
( - promoted by Jennifer Read)
The Georgetown County School District says it was a complaint from the national organization Americans United for the Separation of Church and State that resulted in the decision to discontinue a morning prayer time and the passing out of scriptures at Georgetown High School. Read the Georgetown Times story here. 
|
|
There's More...
:: (1
Comments, 431 words in story)
|
|
Fri Feb 05, 2010 at 10:43:03 AM EST
|
|
Cross posted from Nourishing the Planet. Everywhere I travel in Africa, there's increasing acknowledgement about the importance of nutrition when it comes to treating HIV/AIDS. Many retroviral and HIV/AIDS drugs don't work if patients aren't getting enough vitamins and nutrients in their diets or accumulating enough body fat. According to Dr. Rosa Costa, Director of the Kyeema Foundation in Mozambique, many farmers are often too sick to grow crops, but "chickens are easy." The International Rural Poultry Center of the Kyeema Foundation and the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics are working with farmers-most of them women-to raise chickens on their farms. Because women are often the primary caregivers for family members with HIV/AIDS, they need easy, low-cost sources of both food and income. Unlike many crops, raising free-range birds can require few outside inputs and very little maintenance from farmers. Birds can forage for insects and eat kitchen scraps, instead of expensive grains. They provide not only meat and eggs for household use and income, but also pest control and manure for fertilizer.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Wed Feb 03, 2010 at 12:30:07 PM EST
|
|
Cross posted from Nourishing the Planet.  Jessica Milgroom isn't your typical graduate student. Rather than spending her days in the library of Wageningen University in the Netherlands, her research is done in the field-literally. Since 2006, Jessica has been working with farming communities living inside Limpopo National Park, in southern Mozambique.
When the park was established in 2001, it was essentially "parked on top of 27,000 people," says Jessica. Some 7,000 of the residents needed to be resettled to other areas, including within the park, which affected their access to food and farmland. Jessica's job is to see what can be done to improve resettlement food security. But rather than simply recommending intensified agriculture in the park to make better use of less land, Jessica worked with the local community to collect and identify local seed varieties. One of the major problems in Mozambique, as well as other countries in sub-Saharan Africa, is the lack of seed. As a result, farmers are forced to buy low-quality seed because nothing else is available. In addition to identifying and collecting seeds, Jessica is working with a farmer's association on seed trials, testing varieties to see what people like best. In addition, farmers are learning how to purify and store seeds (see Innovation of the Week: Investing in Better Food Storage in Africa). Weevils, the farmers tell Jessica, are worse than ever, destroying both the seed and crops they store in traditional open-air, granaries. But the farmers are now building newer granaries that are more tightly sealed and help prevent not only weevils but also mold and aflatoxins from damaging crops. Today, farmers and breeders alike have a greater respect for Mozambique's indigenous seed varieties. According to Jessica, one of the biggest accomplishments of the project has been getting breeders and farmers to talk to each other. "It's been interesting for both groups," says Jessica, "and it needs to be a regular discussion" between them.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 15:01:39 PM EST
|
|
This is in consideration of the plan put forward by Jim Rex, candidate for South Carolina Governor concerning the use of an increase in the cigarette tax to pay for education first and then health care. While this is a out of the box idea, you have to watch out on funding education from a sales based activity. This thought process has gotten South Carolina into a lot of trouble by basing service funding off of sales based taxes. What's worse, if you read the article, Governor Sanford will allow an increase in the cigarette tax but offset it with a decrease in income or other taxes. How idiotic of Republicans once again, the State is in dire straits already and this would make it worse.
This entire thought process is unimagineable by the Republican Leadership and the question that has to be asked, are you kidding me? The basics of revenue generation for the government is not rocket science but the Republicans in South Carolina somehow missed those classes when they went to college.
What should be done is the increase in the cigarette tax would fund Human Services, Medicaid, and Tobacco use reduction programs, all of these areas are under stress from the smoking related health issues anyway. This would fund these services from these additional funds and create less stress on general income tax revenues, which could be redirected into education.
Education should be funded fully off of the property tax, without being exempted as currently. But a more targeted approach can provide property tax relief and also improve state funding for public education, according to this new report by Daphne A. Kenyon, a visiting fellow at the Lincoln Institute. State governments who have tried to reduce property taxes and improve school performance at the same time have not met with much success according to the report. Arguing that the use of property tax revenue for schools is fundamentally sound, the report points out that increasing state aid for education does not necessarily result in lower property taxes, and it cautions against switching to greater reliance on a sales tax to fund schools. The report also recommends a targeted approach, distributing state aid for public education to the neediest school districts, schools, and students. We have to all agree it makes no sense to allow cigarettes in South Carolina to have the lowest tax when smoking related illnesses in the State put a strain on the health services in the State.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 12:13:11 PM EST
|
( - promoted by Tim Kelly)
Democrats and activists from across the Lowcountry gathered in N. Charleston on Saturday for a daylong organizing event called “Yes to Rational Solutions, No to Fear” sponsored by the Charleston County Democratic Party. 100 people participated in the event. Left Shawn Mitchell helps lead a healthcare discussion.
The day began with a New Orleans style breakfast at the Crescent Connection Bistro which featured remarks from Frank Holleman, candidate for State Superintendent of Education and a debate between the announced candidates for the Democratic Nomination for the 1st. Congressional District seat. Holleman’s remarks were though provoking. The debate, which lasted about 30 minutes focuses on Energy, Healthcare, Education and Jobs. Sgt. Robert Dobbs, Col. Robert Burton and Lt. Dick Withington (all veterans) participated in the debate. It ended with a call for everyone present to take a hard look at the candidates and “pick a horse to ride. WCIV, TV 4 covered the debate and recorded video with all three candidates during the breakfast, our only major media coverage of the day. Withington and Dobbs both recorded studio videos later that day introducing themselves to voters. Robert Burton later put a segment of the debate recorded by his campaign on his website. See Withington Introductor Video. See Dobbs Introductor Video. See Burton Video recorded by his campaign during the debate. Details and multimedia links in extended text below
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 1091 words in story)
|
|
Fri Jan 22, 2010 at 10:38:42 AM EST
|
|
Cross posted from Nourishing the Planet.  For the past few months, we've been collecting information about agricultural innovations from all over the world (survey in English and French). We shared the initial responses in September and even more responses in November, but continue to receive interesting information and recommendations from farmers, NGOs, research groups, and policymakers in a multitude of countries. Below are a few tidbits we'd like to share.
The following projects, already featured on the Nourishing the Planet blog, have recently provided information for our survey, further describing their agricultural innovations and helping us as we seek to define innovations that best nourish people as well as the world in our upcoming report, State of the World 2011. From our friends at the Developing Innovations in School Cultivation project in the Mukono District, Uganda: Describing the innovation as spreading a "passion for producing local foods to the next generation," Edward Mukiibi helped flesh out the details of his project by filling out the survey after Danielle's visit. You can read more here: Cultivating a Passion for Agriculture, Conversations with Farmers: Discussing the School Garden with a DISC Project Student, and How to Keep Kids "Down on the Farm." From Never Ending Food in Lilongwe, Malawi: The Nordins are educating others about permaculture and growing indigenous crops to increase income and improve food security. You can read about Danielle's visit to their home and farm here: Malawi's Real "Miracle" and Sweeping Change. Please continue to share your agriculture innovations with us. We look forward to featuring your success stories on our blog and in Nourishing the Planet. Stay tuned for more updates from the survey-maybe next time it will be your innovation we highlight!
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Wed Jan 20, 2010 at 10:28:41 AM EST
|
( - promoted by Jennifer Read)
 I would like to enjoy watching Scott Brown's leggy daughter sing, but the memory of the man who called my law office on Monday desperate to get followup treatment after an ER visit from anyone makes it impossible. I would love to be a Republlican, but being the nearsighted attorney that I am, i am up to my elbows in the human misery of divorces of people who could barely take care of their children when married, whose lifetime of honest work has secured nothing.No amount of zoloft and Scotch keeps the rising sound of suffering and fear in our culture out of my ears. I know how evil Exxon, Cigna and Walmart are. I know the poor are not saints. We are asked to choose between a decent world and a brutal one. It is a hard messy business. This is no time for a Caribbean vacation or a month long crycing jag. On January 30th. in Charleston, we are going to do some of the many things we need to do right now. Read about it in the extended text.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 790 words in story)
|
|
Wed Jan 20, 2010 at 10:02:16 AM EST
|
|
Cross posted from Nourishing the Planet.
 Mokolodi Wildlife Reserve used to be known more for raising livestock than protecting wildlife. But after years of ranching degraded the land, the owner decided to devote the area to protecting elephants, giraffes, impala, kudu, crocodiles, hippos, ostrich, warthogs, and various other animals and birds. But the reserve hasn't stopped raising food.
In addition to teaching students and the community about conserving and protecting wildlife and the environment, they're also educating students about permaculture. By growing indigenous vegetables, recycling water for irrigation, and using organic fertilizers-including elephant dung-the Reserve's Education Center is demonstrating how to grow nutritious food with very little water or chemical inputs. (See Malawi's Real "Miracle" and Emphasizing Malawi's Indigenous Vegetables as Crops.)
I met with Tuelo Lekgowe and his wife, Moho Sehtomo, who are managing the permaculture garden at Mokolodi. Tuelo explained that the organically grown spinach, tomatoes, onions, lettuce, green peppers, garlic, basil, parsley, coriander and other crops raised at the garden are used to feed the school groups who come regularly to learn about not only animals, but also sustainable agriculture. Tuelo and Moho use the garden as a classroom, teaching students about composting, intercropping, water harvesting, and organic agriculture practices. The garden also supplies food for the Education Center and Mokolodi's restaurant, feeding the hundreds of students and tourists who visit the non-profit reserve each week.
The Mokolodi Reserve is another example of how agriculture and wildlife conservation can go hand-in hand.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 12:04:49 PM EST
|
( - promoted by Jennifer Read)
 Image, left, Setup of Lowcountry Democratic Operations Center, Oct. 2009. Additional space within the building has been rented for the day to accommodate the event. Lowcountry people supportive of President Obama’s agenda for Hope and Change will work all day Saturday, January 30 to bring ideas and effort together for a better America. That day, FOX news personalities Glenn Beck and Bill O’Reilly will be cultivating an atmosphere of fear at the North Charleston coliseum. Democrats will devote the day to solution-oriented training discussions, phone banking and voter registration efforts at the Lowcountry Democratic operations center and elsewhere in North Charleston. Supporters of President Obama are invited to register and participate. Full details on the day’s events can be found at http://tinyurl.com/sc-change2010. EVENT DETAILS IN EXTENDED TEXT
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 440 words in story)
|
|
Mon Jan 11, 2010 at 11:07:40 AM EST
|
|
A quick update on last week's post highlighting Democratic candidate Frank Holleman's impressive fundraising haul. Over the weekend, Republicans Mick Zais, Kelly Payne, Brent Nelson, and Elizabeth Moffly all filed their respective fourth-quarter reports, and it looks like more good news for the Greenville Democrat. According to the latest filings, Holleman raked in more cash than all four of his would-be GOP competitors combined:
Frank Holleman (D) (Report amended 1/8/10):
Contributions: $210,465
Loans: $0
Expenditures: $47,644.98
Cash on Hand: $171,945.47
Mick Zais (R):
Contributions: $32,955
Loans: $100,000
Expenditures: $9,119
Cash on Hand: $125,011
As expected, the Newberry College President had the strongest showing among the GOP field, raising double the amount of his nearest competitor, Kelly Payne. Zais also signaled to his competition that he's in it to win it, taking out a $100,000 loan to supplement his campaign. He also invested the most in consultants, spending $5,600 on Ragley Public Affairs and $3,000 on Starboard Communications.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 197 words in story)
|
|
Thu Jan 07, 2010 at 18:56:47 PM EST
|
|
The Republican Governor Mark Sanford, Republican State Senate, DINO's, and the Republican General Assembly were promising tax relief and a more simple system of taxation. Well South Carolina you got it and when the economy tanked, this voodoo economic/taxation system went down as well and now is decimating the education system, economy, and government in South Carolina. The Republicans (and some DINO's) would have South Carolinians believe that schools have more money now. South Carolina don't believe it, this didn't happen! The General Assembly added property tax relief to the existing state aid to schools through EFA (Education Finance Act), EIA (Education Improvement Act), and state grants. This didn't create a situation in which schools had more money, but that residential property owners had more money. These additional funds weren’t going to be used on improving the quality of K-12 education because the funds are not in the system anymore. South Carolina's renters and businesses also didn’t get tax relief either. Republicans would have South Carolinians believe they have a lower tax rate than many other States in the nation, true but not entirely. South Carolina may be ranked in the lower quadrant of taxation but ranks 14th in the U.S. in per capita fees and charges. These fees are regressive, make the revenue system less equitable, and do not fund public schools. What property owners need to understand is that with a higher value property, there is an association with a higher income and a higher ability to pay those property taxes. These higher home values help create good quality schools, which in turn help increase the value of homes in those areas, not to mention better communities and more opportunities for businesses. So let's look at the reliance on sales taxes as opposed to income and property taxes. By South Carolina putting a larger reliance on sales taxes, they exposed themselves to any economic downturn in the economy and consumer spending. What higher sales tax rates do facilitate is that South Carolinians turn to internet, catalog, and neighbor state shopping. This creates losses of revenue for local merchants, small businesses, and local governments, in addition to the loss of revenues for the State of South Carolina. Who pays the most as far as income taxes in South Carolina, well to put it simply the lower income and middle class? In an analysis by the Institute on Taxation & Economic Policy – November 2009: • South Carolinians earning less than $16,000 pay 7.1 percent; • Middle-income South Carolinians earning between $27,000 and $44,000, pay 7.9 percent;
• Upper-middle income South Carolinians earning between $44,000 and $74,000 pay 8.2 percent and those earning between $74,000 and $150,000 pay 8.5 percent.
So who pays the least, of course the upper income levels in South Carolina. In the same study as above:
• South Carolinians earning between $150,000 and $390,000 pay 7.4 percent which is lower than any other level other than those earning less than $16,000;
• South Carolinians earning above $390,000 pay only 6.4 percent, the lowest of all levels.
In this same study, Vermont’s tax system is among the least regressive in the nation because it has a highly progressive income tax and low sales and excise taxes. Vermont’s tax system is also made less unfair by the state’s refundable Earned income Tax Credit (EITC).
So South Carolina Republicans, how do you expect your system of government to function when those with the financial resources pay the least and those who don't have the financial resources pay the most? It is a widely known fact that states that have a disproportionate reliance on sales and excise taxes make their taxes among the highest in the entire nation on low-income families. So what do the citizens and voters of South Carolina need to do? First you have to understand the entire tax system needs to be restructured and this means some will pound the drums that taxes are going up. Well they will, but for those who are currently getting away with paying less, these should change to be more equitable. Secondly, everyone should understand this process will take some time but the results will be better for education, lower income and middle class families, and help government properly fund services. Everyone wants government to be there and provide services for them, but don't want to pay for it. The goal is to make South Carolina not a poor state anymore but one helps all become successful and earn more money, which in turn helps everyone. Here are some facts to consider about South Carolina from the US Census Bureau: • Of the 133,563 South Carolina families with 2006 income below the federal poverty level, two-thirds had one or more workers.
• In 2006, 22% of South Carolina’s children lived in poverty – below $20,444 for a two-parent family with 2 children. • Forty-four percent of South Carolina children in 2006 lived in families with incomes below 200% of the federal poverty level.
|
|
Discuss
:: (1
Comments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
